2 910 879 libros electrónicos en 110 idiomas
¿No le conviene? No hay problema. Puedes devolver los artículos hasta 30 días
No se equivocará con un vale de regalo. El destinatario puede elegir cualquier producto de nuestra oferta.
Hasta 30 días para devoluciones
To explain decision behavior by reducing it to §utility maximization, as Kahneman and Tversky (2000) §do, or to intuitive behavior, as Gigerenzer (1996) §does, is to risk oversimplification. There is no §single definition of rational decision behavior. The §context defines what decision behavior can be §evaluated as rational. In the context of morality, §subjects base their decision behavior on four §different ethical positions: deontology, hedonism, §intuitionism and utilitarianism. In this article the §classical Asian disease problem (ADP), used by §Kahneman and Tversky (1981) to show the framing §effect, is understood as a moral dilemma. To reach a §decision, subjects relied to varying degrees on all §four ethical positions. Variation of the ADP`s §personal proximity influenced subjects decision §behavior, leading to the disappearance of the §framing effect, and changing the extent of subjects §reliance on the four ethical positions.
¡Hola! Soy Libroamiko, tu asesor de libros.
¿Cómo puedo ayudarte?